SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| SuperScalar K10 | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 45.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 1,845 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 41,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 8.3 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 6,295 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| SuperScalar | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
SuperScalar K10
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KS2 comes out ahead — it takes 6 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 600 J/TH). Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the SuperScalar K10 and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS2 4344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 35% better power draw (1,845 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver KS2 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- SuperScalar K10 44% better weight (8.3 vs 14.9 kg)
- SuperScalar K10 54% more heat output (6,295 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 61% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| SuperScalar K10 | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $5,200 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$4.43 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$6,816 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$8,431 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$10,047 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-4.43/day for the SuperScalar K10. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the SuperScalar K10 or Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the SuperScalar K10 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS2: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the SuperScalar K10). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
SuperScalar K10 vs Iceriver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The SuperScalar K10 runs at 41,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 40,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (41,000 vs 600 J/TH).