Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 50.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 100 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 2,000,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 50 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.5 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 341 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 64/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Iceriver KS2 l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 3999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS2 3999900% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 92% better power draw (100 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver KS2 100% better efficacité (2,000,000 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 33% better noise (50.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 83% better weight (2.5 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KS2 1100% more heat output (341 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh 42% more score de minage domestique (64.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $280 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$0.24 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$368 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$455 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$543 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50MhScore: 64/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is more profitable at $-0.24/day compared to $-2.81/day for the Iceriver KS2. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs Iceriver KS2: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Iceriver KS2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh or the Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh scores 64/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 45/100 for the Iceriver KS2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh vs Iceriver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver ALEO AE0 50Mh runs at 2,000,000.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,999,400.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (2,000,000 vs 600 J/TH).