Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 720.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 1,300 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 1,805,555.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 60 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.5 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 4,436 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 52/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AE2 720Mh
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver KS2, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 600 J/TH) in the Iceriver KS2's favour. The Iceriver AE2 720Mh holds the edge in score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AE2 720Mh and Iceriver KS2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver KS2 277678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 8% better power draw (1,300 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver KS2 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 20% better noise (60.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KS2 4% better weight (15.5 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 8% more heat output (4,436 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver AE2 720Mh 16% more score de minage domestique (52.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver AE2 720Mh | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$3.12 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$2,734 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$3,873 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$5,011 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver AE2 720MhScore: 52/100. 60 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KS2600.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or Iceriver KS2 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-3.12/day for the Iceriver AE2 720Mh. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver KS2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh is quieter at 60 dB compared to the Iceriver KS2 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AE2 720Mh or the Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 45/100 for the Iceriver KS2). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AE2 720Mh vs Iceriver KS2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AE2 720Mh runs at 1,805,555.6 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,804,955.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (1,805,556 vs 600 J/TH).