Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Thewindminer K9

Thewindminer K9

Taux de hachage 10.3 TH/s Puissance 3,300 W Efficiency 320.4 J/TH
VS
Iceriver KS3

Iceriver KS3

Taux de hachage 8.0 TH/s Puissance 3,200 W Efficiency 400.0 J/TH

Thewindminer K9 vs Iceriver KS3

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Thewindminer K9 Specification Iceriver KS3
10.3 TH/s Taux de hachage 8.0 TH/s
3,300 W Consommation électrique 3,200 W
320.4 J/TH Efficiency 400.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
14.8 kg Weight 13.5 kg
11,260 BTU/hr BTU Output 10,918 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 36/100
Release Year
KHeavyHash Algorithme KHeavyHash
Thewindminer Manufacturer IceRiver

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Thewindminer K9

Daily Revenue 0.00000474 BTC $0.37
Daily Electricity -$7.92
Daily Profit -$7.55
Monthly -$226.48
Yearly -$2,755.53

Iceriver KS3

Daily Revenue 0.00000368 BTC $0.29
Daily Electricity -$7.68
Daily Profit -$7.39
Monthly -$221.76
Yearly -$2,698.14

Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Scored side by side, the Thewindminer K9 and Iceriver KS3 trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Thewindminer K9 and Iceriver KS3 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Thewindminer K9 29% more hashrate (10.3 vs 8.0 TH/s)
  • Iceriver KS3 3% better power draw (3,300 vs 3,200 W)
  • Thewindminer K9 20% better efficacité (320 vs 400 J/TH)
  • Iceriver KS3 9% better weight (14.8 vs 13.5 kg)
  • Thewindminer K9 3% more heat output (11,260 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
  • Iceriver KS3 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Thewindminer K9 Metric Iceriver KS3
$15,429 Upfront cost (MSRP) $730
-$7.55 Daily net profit -$7.39
-$18,185 Net after 1 year -$3,428
-$20,940 Net after 2 years -$6,126
-$23,696 Net after 3 years -$8,824
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Iceriver KS3

Score: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Thewindminer K9

320.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Thewindminer K9 or the Iceriver KS3?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS3 is more profitable at $-7.39/day compared to $-7.55/day for the Thewindminer K9. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Thewindminer K9 or Iceriver KS3?

The Iceriver KS3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Thewindminer K9 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Thewindminer K9 vs Iceriver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?

The Iceriver KS3 scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Thewindminer K9). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the Thewindminer K9 and Iceriver KS3 on J/TH?

The Thewindminer K9 runs at 320.4 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 79.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (320 vs 400 J/TH).