Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell KA BOX Pro | Specification | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.6 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 200.0 GH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 100 W |
| 375.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 500.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 2.5 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 341 BTU/hr |
| 58/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell KA BOX Pro l'emporte sur 5 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 700% more hashrate (1.6 vs 0.2 TH/s). The Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro claws back ground on consommation électrique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell KA BOX Pro and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 700% more hashrate (1.6 vs 0.2 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 83% better power draw (600 vs 100 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 25% better efficacité (375 vs 500 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro 4% better weight (2.6 vs 2.5 kg)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 500% more heat output (2,047 vs 341 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 61% more score de minage domestique (58.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell KA BOX Pro | Metric | Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $129 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $79 |
| -$1.38 | Daily net profit | -$0.23 |
| -$634 | Net after 1 year | -$164 |
| -$1,138 | Net after 2 years | -$249 |
| -$1,643 | Net after 3 years | -$334 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX Pro375.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro or the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro is more profitable at $-0.23/day compared to $-1.38/day for the Goldshell KA BOX Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell KA BOX Pro vs Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro or Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell KA BOX Pro and Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro on J/TH?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KAS KS0 Pro runs at 500.0 J/TH — a difference of 125.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 25% better efficacité (375 vs 500 J/TH).