Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 375.0 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell KA BOX Pro l'emporte sur 5 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 375 J/TH) in the Goldshell KA BOX Pro's favour. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KA BOX Pro sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 444344% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 82% better power draw (3,300 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 375 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 81% better weight (13.5 vs 2.6 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 450% more heat output (11,260 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 16% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $129 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$1.38 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$634 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$1,138 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$1,643 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX Pro375.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KA BOX Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell KA BOX Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,291.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 375 J/TH).