Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.6 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 600 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 375.0 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 55 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 2.6 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 2,047 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 58/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell KA BOX Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell KA BOX Pro l'emporte sur 6 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 375 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KA BOX Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 296196% more hashrate (0.0 vs 1.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 81% better power draw (3,200 vs 600 W)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 375 J/TH)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 35% better noise (85.0 vs 55.0 dB)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 79% better weight (12.5 vs 2.6 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 433% more heat output (10,918 vs 2,047 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell KA BOX Pro 100% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 58.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell KA BOX Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $129 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$1.38 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$634 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$1,138 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$1,643 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell KA BOX ProScore: 58/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell KA BOX Pro375.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KA BOX Pro more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell KA BOX Pro is more profitable at $-1.38/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell KA BOX Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell KA BOX Pro scores 58/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell KA BOX Pro?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell KA BOX Pro runs at 375.0 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,550.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 375 J/TH).