Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE vs Iceriver KS3
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE | Specification | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 8.0 TH/s |
| 500 W | Consommation électrique | 3,200 W |
| 250.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 400.0 J/TH |
| 45 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 5.0 kg | Weight | 13.5 kg |
| 1,706 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 10,918 BTU/hr |
| 62/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE
Iceriver KS3
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 6 (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 84% better power draw (500 vs 3,200 W). The Iceriver KS3 claws back ground on hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE and Iceriver KS3 sit on each measurable spec:
- Iceriver KS3 300% more hashrate (2.0 vs 8.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 84% better power draw (500 vs 3,200 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 38% better efficacité (250 vs 400 J/TH)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 40% better noise (45.0 vs 75.0 dB)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 63% better weight (5.0 vs 13.5 kg)
- Iceriver KS3 540% more heat output (1,706 vs 10,918 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE 72% more score de minage domestique (62.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE | Metric | Iceriver KS3 |
|---|---|---|
| $458 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $730 |
| -$1.13 | Daily net profit | -$7.39 |
| -$870 | Net after 1 year | -$3,428 |
| -$1,281 | Net after 2 years | -$6,126 |
| -$1,693 | Net after 3 years | -$8,824 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITEScore: 62/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE250.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE vs Iceriver KS3: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is more profitable at $-1.13/day compared to $-7.39/day for the Iceriver KS3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE vs Iceriver KS3: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Iceriver KS3 at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE vs Iceriver KS3: which fits a residential setup better?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE scores 62/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KS3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE and Iceriver KS3 on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS2 LITE runs at 250.0 J/TH while the Iceriver KS3 runs at 400.0 J/TH — a difference of 150.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (250 vs 400 J/TH).