Iceriver KAS KS5M vs Iceriver KS2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver KAS KS5M | Specification | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 TH/s |
| 3,400 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 226.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 600.0 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 15.0 kg | Weight | 14.9 kg |
| 11,601 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 45/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| KHeavyHash | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver KAS KS5M
Iceriver KS2
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Iceriver KAS KS5M comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 2.0 TH/s). The Iceriver KS2 claws back ground on consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Iceriver KAS KS5M and Iceriver KS2 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 650% more hashrate (15.0 vs 2.0 TH/s)
- Iceriver KS2 65% better power draw (3,400 vs 1,200 W)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 62% better efficacité (227 vs 600 J/TH)
- Iceriver KS2 1% better weight (15.0 vs 14.9 kg)
- Iceriver KAS KS5M 183% more heat output (11,601 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Iceriver KS2 25% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 45.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Iceriver KAS KS5M | Metric | Iceriver KS2 |
|---|---|---|
| $449 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $399 |
| -$7.62 | Daily net profit | -$2.81 |
| -$3,230 | Net after 1 year | -$1,424 |
| -$6,012 | Net after 2 years | -$2,449 |
| -$8,793 | Net after 3 years | -$3,474 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Iceriver KS2Score: 45/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver KAS KS5M226.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver KAS KS5M or the Iceriver KS2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Iceriver KS2 is more profitable at $-2.81/day compared to $-7.62/day for the Iceriver KAS KS5M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Iceriver KAS KS5M or the Iceriver KS2 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Iceriver KAS KS5M or Iceriver KS2?
The Iceriver KS2 scores 45/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver KAS KS5M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Iceriver KAS KS5M and Iceriver KS2 on J/TH?
The Iceriver KAS KS5M runs at 226.7 J/TH while the Iceriver KS2 runs at 600.0 J/TH — a difference of 373.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 62% better efficacité (227 vs 600 J/TH).