Baikal Miner Cube vs StrongU STU-U6
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Baikal Miner Cube | Specification | StrongU STU-U6 |
|---|---|---|
| 300.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 440.0 GH/s |
| 90 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 300,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 5,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 7,200.0 kg |
| 307 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 26/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Baikal | Manufacturer | StrongU |
Profitability Comparison
Baikal Miner Cube
StrongU STU-U6
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le StrongU STU-U6 l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 146567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s). The Baikal Miner Cube holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Baikal Miner Cube and StrongU STU-U6 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- StrongU STU-U6 146567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.4 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 96% better power draw (90.0 vs 2,200.0 W)
- StrongU STU-U6 98% better efficacité (300,000 vs 5,000 J/TH)
- StrongU STU-U6 2344% more heat output (307 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Miner Cube 38% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 26.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Baikal Miner Cube | Metric | StrongU STU-U6 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $5,235 |
| -$0.22 | Daily net profit | -$5.26 |
| -$1,079 | Net after 1 year | -$7,156 |
| -$1,158 | Net after 2 years | -$9,078 |
| -$1,236 | Net after 3 years | -$10,999 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Miner CubeScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
StrongU STU-U65,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Baikal Miner Cube or StrongU STU-U6 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-5.26/day for the StrongU STU-U6. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Baikal Miner Cube or StrongU STU-U6?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Baikal Miner Cube or the StrongU STU-U6?
The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the StrongU STU-U6). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Baikal Miner Cube vs StrongU STU-U6: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH while the StrongU STU-U6 runs at 5,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 295,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (300,000 vs 5,000 J/TH).