Obelisk SC1 Immersion vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Obelisk SC1 Immersion | Specification | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| 2.2 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 11.0 TH/s |
| 1,600 W | Consommation électrique | 2,820 W |
| 727.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 256.4 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| — | Weight | 13.1 kg |
| 5,459 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 9,622 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 22/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake2b | Algorithme | Blake2b |
| Obelisk | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Obelisk SC1 Immersion
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 400% more hashrate (2.2 vs 11.0 TH/s). The Obelisk SC1 Immersion holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Obelisk SC1 Immersion and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 400% more hashrate (2.2 vs 11.0 TH/s)
- Obelisk SC1 Immersion 43% better power draw (1,600 vs 2,820 W)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 65% better efficacité (727 vs 256 J/TH)
- Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) 76% more heat output (5,459 vs 9,622 BTU/hr)
- Obelisk SC1 Immersion 27% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 22.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Obelisk SC1 Immersion | Metric | Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $430 |
| -$3.76 | Daily net profit | -$6.37 |
| -$1,373 | Net after 1 year | -$2,756 |
| -$2,745 | Net after 2 years | -$5,082 |
| -$4,118 | Net after 3 years | -$7,407 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Obelisk SC1 ImmersionScore: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)256.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Obelisk SC1 Immersion vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Obelisk SC1 Immersion is more profitable at $-3.76/day compared to $-6.37/day for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Obelisk SC1 Immersion vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Obelisk SC1 Immersion vs Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th): which fits a residential setup better?
The Obelisk SC1 Immersion scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Obelisk SC1 Immersion and Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) on J/TH?
The Obelisk SC1 Immersion runs at 727.3 J/TH while the Goldshell SC5 Pro (11Th) runs at 256.4 J/TH — a difference of 470.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 65% better efficacité (727 vs 256 J/TH).