Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Bitfily Snow Panther B1

Bitfily Snow Panther B1

Taux de hachage 16.0 TH/s Puissance 1,380 W Efficiency 86.3 J/TH
VS
Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Taux de hachage 52.0 TH/s Puissance 2,800 W Efficiency 53.9 J/TH

Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Bitfily Snow Panther B1 Specification Innosilicon T3+ 52T
16.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 52.0 TH/s
1,380 W Consommation électrique 2,800 W
86.3 J/TH Efficiency 53.9 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
4,500.0 kg Weight 10,000.0 kg
4,709 BTU/hr BTU Output 9,554 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 22/100
Release Year
SHA-256 Algorithme SHA-256
Bitfily Manufacturer Innosilicon

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Bitfily Snow Panther B1

Daily Revenue 0.00000736 BTC $0.58
Daily Electricity -$3.31
Daily Profit -$2.74
Monthly -$82.08
Yearly -$998.69

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

Daily Revenue 0.00002393 BTC $1.87
Daily Electricity -$6.72
Daily Profit -$4.85
Monthly -$145.45
Yearly -$1,769.69

Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Innosilicon T3+ 52T l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). Its biggest concrete edge: 225% more hashrate (16.0 vs 52.0 TH/s). That said, the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Innosilicon T3+ 52T — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 and Innosilicon T3+ 52T actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 225% more hashrate (16.0 vs 52.0 TH/s)
  • Bitfily Snow Panther B1 51% better power draw (1,380 vs 2,800 W)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 38% better efficacité (86.3 vs 53.9 J/TH)
  • Bitfily Snow Panther B1 55% better weight (4,500 vs 10,000 kg)
  • Innosilicon T3+ 52T 103% more heat output (4,709 vs 9,554 BTU/hr)
  • Bitfily Snow Panther B1 41% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 22.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Bitfily Snow Panther B1

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon T3+ 52T

53.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitfily Snow Panther B1 is more profitable at $-2.74/day compared to $-4.85/day for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: which fits a residential setup better?

The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Innosilicon T3+ 52T). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

Bitfily Snow Panther B1 vs Innosilicon T3+ 52T: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The Bitfily Snow Panther B1 runs at 86.3 J/TH while the Innosilicon T3+ 52T runs at 53.9 J/TH — a difference of 32.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 38% better efficacité (86.3 vs 53.9 J/TH).