iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4 BRICK
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Specification | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| 280.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 65.0 MH/s |
| 240 W | Consommation électrique | 30 W |
| 857,142.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 1,000.0 kg | Weight | 4,800.0 kg |
| 819 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 102 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Etchash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus
Jasminer X4 BRICK
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Jasminer X4 BRICK, which leads on 3 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Its biggest concrete edge: 88% better power draw (240.0 vs 30.0 W). The iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus holds the edge in rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus and Jasminer X4 BRICK actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 331% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 88% better power draw (240.0 vs 30.0 W)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 46% better efficacité (857,143 vs 461,538 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 79% better weight (1,000 vs 4,800 kg)
- iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus 700% more heat output (819 vs 102 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 23% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus | Metric | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| $369 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $107 |
| -$0.58 | Daily net profit | -$0.07 |
| -$579 | Net after 1 year | -$133 |
| -$789 | Net after 2 years | -$159 |
| -$1,000 | Net after 3 years | -$186 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4 BRICKScore: 38/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X4 BRICK461,538.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or the Jasminer X4 BRICK?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4 BRICK is more profitable at $-0.07/day compared to $-0.58/day for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus vs Jasminer X4 BRICK: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus or Jasminer X4 BRICK?
The Jasminer X4 BRICK scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus and Jasminer X4 BRICK?
The iPollo V1 Mini Classic Plus runs at 857,142.9 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 BRICK runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 395,604.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficacité (857,143 vs 461,538 J/TH).