Jasminer X16-Q pro vs Jasminer X4 BRICK
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-Q pro | Specification | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| 2.1 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 65.0 MH/s |
| 520 W | Consommation électrique | 30 W |
| 253,658.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 461,538.5 J/TH |
| 40 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 10.0 kg | Weight | 4,800.0 kg |
| 1,774 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 102 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-Q pro
Jasminer X4 BRICK
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-Q pro comes out ahead — it takes 5 of 6 (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 3054% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). That said, the Jasminer X4 BRICK isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X16-Q pro and Jasminer X4 BRICK sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 3054% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4 BRICK 94% better power draw (520.0 vs 30.0 W)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 45% better efficacité (253,659 vs 461,538 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 100% better weight (10.0 vs 4,800.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 1633% more heat output (1,774 vs 102 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-Q pro 71% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Jasminer X16-Q pro | Metric | Jasminer X4 BRICK |
|---|---|---|
| $1,249 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $107 |
| -$1.25 | Daily net profit | -$0.07 |
| -$1,704 | Net after 1 year | -$133 |
| -$2,160 | Net after 2 years | -$159 |
| -$2,615 | Net after 3 years | -$186 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-Q proScore: 65/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-Q pro253,658.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Jasminer X16-Q pro or the Jasminer X4 BRICK?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4 BRICK is more profitable at $-0.07/day compared to $-1.25/day for the Jasminer X16-Q pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Jasminer X16-Q pro vs Jasminer X4 BRICK: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Jasminer X4 BRICK at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Jasminer X16-Q pro vs Jasminer X4 BRICK: which fits a residential setup better?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 38/100 for the Jasminer X4 BRICK). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Jasminer X16-Q pro and Jasminer X4 BRICK on J/TH?
The Jasminer X16-Q pro runs at 253,658.5 J/TH while the Jasminer X4 BRICK runs at 461,538.5 J/TH — a difference of 207,879.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 45% better efficacité (253,659 vs 461,538 J/TH).