iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 330.0 MH/s |
| 232 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 580,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 727,272.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 2.4 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 792 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 20% better efficacité (580,000 vs 727,273 J/TH). That said, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 21% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 3% better power draw (232 vs 240 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 20% better efficacité (580,000 vs 727,273 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 3% more heat output (792 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 113% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| $399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $899 |
| -$0.56 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$602 | Net after 1 year | -$1,109 |
| -$805 | Net after 2 years | -$1,319 |
| -$1,009 | Net after 3 years | -$1,530 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus580,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-0.58/day for the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 147,272.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 20% better efficacité (580,000 vs 727,273 J/TH).