iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 400.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.8 GH/s |
| 232 W | Consommation électrique | 1,900 W |
| 580,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.4 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 792 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Jasminer X16-P l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 1350% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X16-P's favour. That said, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus and Jasminer X16-P sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-P 1350% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 88% better power draw (232 vs 1,900 W)
- Jasminer X16-P 44% better efficacité (580,000 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 83% better weight (2.4 vs 14.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 719% more heat output (792 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus 11% more score de minage domestique (31.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $399 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$0.56 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$602 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$805 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$1,009 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini SE PlusScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus or the Jasminer X16-P?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus is more profitable at $-0.56/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus or the Jasminer X16-P better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus vs Jasminer X16-P: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus and Jasminer X16-P on J/TH?
The iPollo V1 Mini SE Plus runs at 580,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 252,413.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 44% better efficacité (580,000 vs 327,586 J/TH).