Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260

Taux de hachage 260.0 MH/s Puissance 220 W Efficiency 846,153.9 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 Specification iPollo X1
260.0 MH/s Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s
220 W Consommation électrique 240 W
846,153.9 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
40 dB Niveau de bruit
2.1 kg Weight 1.5 kg
751 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
66/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.53
Daily Profit -$0.53
Monthly -$15.84
Yearly -$192.72

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Scored side by side, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 and iPollo X1 trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 and iPollo X1 sit on each measurable spec:

  • iPollo X1 15% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 8% better power draw (220 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo X1 5% better efficacité (846,154 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo X1 31% better weight (2.1 vs 1.5 kg)
  • iPollo X1 9% more heat output (751 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 113% more score de minage domestique (66.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 Metric iPollo X1
$650 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$0.53 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$843 Net after 1 year -$654
-$1,035 Net after 2 years -$864
-$1,228 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260

Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo X1

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 or the iPollo X1?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is more profitable at $-0.53/day compared to $-0.58/day for the iPollo X1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs iPollo X1: which runs at a lower noise level?

The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the iPollo X1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 or iPollo X1?

The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the iPollo X1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 vs iPollo X1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 260 runs at 846,153.9 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 46,153.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficacité (846,154 vs 800,000 J/TH).