Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

iPollo V1

iPollo V1

Taux de hachage 3.6 GH/s Puissance 3,100 W Efficiency 861,111.1 J/TH
VS
iPollo X1

iPollo X1

Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH

iPollo V1 vs iPollo X1

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

iPollo V1 Specification iPollo X1
3.6 GH/s Taux de hachage 300.0 MH/s
3,100 W Consommation électrique 240 W
861,111.1 J/TH Efficiency 800,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
13,000.0 kg Weight 1.5 kg
10,577 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
22/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
EtHash Algorithme EtHash
iPollo Manufacturer iPollo

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

iPollo V1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$7.44
Daily Profit -$7.44
Monthly -$223.20
Yearly -$2,715.55

iPollo X1

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.24

Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo X1, which leads on 3 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 92% better power draw (3,100 vs 240 W). That said, the iPollo V1 isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.

Winner: iPollo X1 — l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The iPollo V1 and iPollo X1 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • iPollo V1 1100% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • iPollo X1 92% better power draw (3,100 vs 240 W)
  • iPollo X1 7% better efficacité (861,111 vs 800,000 J/TH)
  • iPollo X1 100% better weight (13,000.0 vs 1.5 kg)
  • iPollo V1 1192% more heat output (10,577 vs 819 BTU/hr)
  • iPollo X1 41% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 31.0)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.

iPollo V1 Metric iPollo X1
$1,699 Upfront cost (MSRP) $444
-$7.44 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$4,415 Net after 1 year -$654
-$7,130 Net after 2 years -$864
-$9,846 Net after 3 years -$1,075
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

iPollo X1

Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

iPollo X1

800,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is the iPollo V1 or iPollo X1 more profitable?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo X1 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-7.44/day for the iPollo V1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the iPollo V1 or iPollo X1?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

For mining at home, should I pick the iPollo V1 or the iPollo X1?

The iPollo X1 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the iPollo V1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

iPollo V1 vs iPollo X1: how much does the efficiency gap matter?

The iPollo V1 runs at 861,111.1 J/TH while the iPollo X1 runs at 800,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 61,111.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 7% better efficacité (861,111 vs 800,000 J/TH).