iPollo V2 vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| iPollo V2 | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 10.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.8 GH/s |
| 1,500 W | Consommation électrique | 1,900 W |
| 150,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 16.5 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 5,118 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 48/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| iPollo | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
iPollo V2
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,186 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iPollo V2 edges it: 5 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 54% better efficacité (150,000 vs 327,586 J/TH). The Jasminer X16-P claws back ground on rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the iPollo V2 and Jasminer X16-P sit on each measurable spec:
- iPollo V2 72% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2 21% better power draw (1,500 vs 1,900 W)
- iPollo V2 54% better efficacité (150,000 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-P 15% better weight (16.5 vs 14.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 27% more heat output (5,118 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2 71% more score de minage domestique (48.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| iPollo V2 | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $5,140 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$3.60 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$6,454 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$7,768 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$9,082 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2Score: 48/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2150,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-P more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2 is more profitable at $-3.60/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
iPollo V2 vs Jasminer X16-P: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V2 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Jasminer X16-P at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the iPollo V2 or Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V2 scores 48/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between iPollo V2 and Jasminer X16-P?
The iPollo V2 runs at 150,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 177,586.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 54% better efficacité (150,000 vs 327,586 J/TH).