MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 |
|---|---|---|
| 55.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 464.0 TH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 6,728 W |
| 63.6 J/TH | Efficiency | 14.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 10,700.0 kg | Weight | 18.0 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 22,956 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78
Based on BTC price of $78,194 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 744% more hashrate (55.0 vs 464.0 TH/s) in the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78's favour. The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 744% more hashrate (55.0 vs 464.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M10S 48% better power draw (3,500 vs 6,728 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 77% better efficacité (63.6 vs 14.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 100% better weight (10,700.0 vs 18.0 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 92% more heat output (11,942 vs 22,956 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M10S | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 |
|---|---|---|
| $3,800 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$6.42 | Daily net profit | $0.55 |
| -$6,144 | Net after 1 year | +$200 |
| -$8,487 | Net after 2 years | +$401 |
| -$10,831 | Net after 3 years | +$601 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78$6.97/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M78Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M7814.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 is more profitable at $0.55/day compared to $-6.42/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S or MicroBT WhatsMiner M78?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M10S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M10S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M78: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M10S runs at 63.6 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M78 runs at 14.5 J/TH — a difference of 49.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 77% better efficacité (63.6 vs 14.5 J/TH).