MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| MicroBT Whatsminer M20S | Specification | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S |
|---|---|---|
| 68.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 282.0 TH/s |
| 3,360 W | Consommation électrique | 3,807 W |
| 49.4 J/TH | Efficiency | 13.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 12,500.0 kg | Weight | 25.5 kg |
| 11,464 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,990 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| SHA-256 | Algorithme | SHA-256 |
| MicroBT | Manufacturer | MicroBT |
Profitability Comparison
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S
Based on BTC price of $78,167 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S, which leads on 4 of 5 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 315% more hashrate (68.0 vs 282.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S claws back ground on consommation électrique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 315% more hashrate (68.0 vs 282.0 TH/s)
- MicroBT Whatsminer M20S 12% better power draw (3,360 vs 3,807 W)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 73% better efficacité (49.4 vs 13.5 J/TH)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 100% better weight (12,500.0 vs 25.5 kg)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 13% more heat output (11,464 vs 12,990 BTU/hr)
- MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 36% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 30.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| MicroBT Whatsminer M20S | Metric | MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S |
|---|---|---|
| $66 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$5.62 | Daily net profit | $1.01 |
| -$2,117 | Net after 1 year | +$368 |
| -$4,167 | Net after 2 years | +$735 |
| -$6,218 | Net after 3 years | +$1,103 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S$6.63/day higher profit at current rates.
Best for Home Mining
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72SScore: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S13.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S is more profitable at $1.01/day compared to $-5.62/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S: which runs at a lower noise level?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S: which fits a residential setup better?
The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer M20S). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
MicroBT Whatsminer M20S vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The MicroBT Whatsminer M20S runs at 49.4 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S runs at 13.5 J/TH — a difference of 35.9 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (49.4 vs 13.5 J/TH).