Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

Taux de hachage 48.0 TH/s Puissance 2,200 W Efficiency 45.8 J/TH
VS

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

Taux de hachage 282.0 TH/s Puissance 3,807 W Efficiency 13.5 J/TH

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 vs MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

MicroBT Whatsminer D1 Specification MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S
48.0 TH/s Taux de hachage 282.0 TH/s
2,200 W Consommation électrique 3,807 W
45.8 J/TH Efficiency 13.5 J/TH
Niveau de bruit 75 dB
8,500.0 kg Weight 25.5 kg
7,506 BTU/hr BTU Output 12,990 BTU/hr
26/100 Home Mining Score 30/100
Release Year
Blake256r14 Algorithme SHA-256
MicroBT Manufacturer MicroBT

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

MicroBT Whatsminer D1

Daily Revenue 0.00002209 BTC $1.73
Daily Electricity -$5.28
Daily Profit -$3.55
Monthly -$106.62
Yearly -$1,297.18

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

Daily Revenue 0.00012977 BTC $10.14
Daily Electricity -$9.14
Daily Profit $1.00
Monthly $30.12
Yearly $366.44

Based on BTC price of $78,143 and current network difficulty as of May 17, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 488% more hashrate (48.0 vs 282.0 TH/s). The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S — l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs

Spec Deltas

The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":

  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 488% more hashrate (48.0 vs 282.0 TH/s)
  • MicroBT Whatsminer D1 42% better power draw (2,200 vs 3,807 W)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 71% better efficacité (45.8 vs 13.5 J/TH)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 100% better weight (8,500.0 vs 25.5 kg)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 73% more heat output (7,506 vs 12,990 BTU/hr)
  • MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S 15% more score de minage domestique (26.0 vs 30.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

$4.56/day higher profit at current rates.

Best for Home Mining

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

Score: 30/100. 75 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S

13.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S is more profitable at $1.00/day compared to $-3.55/day for the MicroBT Whatsminer D1. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S is quieter at 75 dB compared to the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.

For mining at home, should I pick the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 or the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S?

The MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 26/100 for the MicroBT Whatsminer D1). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

How far apart are the MicroBT Whatsminer D1 and MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S on J/TH?

The MicroBT Whatsminer D1 runs at 45.8 J/TH while the MicroBT WhatsMiner M72S runs at 13.5 J/TH — a difference of 32.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (45.8 vs 13.5 J/TH).