Jasminer X16-P vs Jasminer X4-Q
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Jasminer X16-P | Specification | Jasminer X4-Q |
|---|---|---|
| 5.8 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.0 GH/s |
| 1,900 W | Consommation électrique | 370 W |
| 327,586.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 355,769.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14.0 kg | Weight | 10,000.0 kg |
| 6,483 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,262 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 34/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | Etchash |
| Jasminer | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Jasminer X16-P
Jasminer X4-Q
Based on BTC price of $78,210 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Jasminer X16-P l'emporte sur 2 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 458% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X16-P's favour. That said, the Jasminer X4-Q isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X16-P and Jasminer X4-Q sit on each measurable spec:
- Jasminer X16-P 458% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X4-Q 81% better power draw (1,900 vs 370 W)
- Jasminer X16-P 8% better efficacité (327,586 vs 355,769 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-P 100% better weight (14.0 vs 10,000.0 kg)
- Jasminer X16-P 414% more heat output (6,483 vs 1,262 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X4-Q 21% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 34.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Jasminer X16-P | Metric | Jasminer X4-Q |
|---|---|---|
| $2,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $210 |
| -$4.56 | Daily net profit | -$0.89 |
| -$4,214 | Net after 1 year | -$534 |
| -$5,879 | Net after 2 years | -$858 |
| -$7,543 | Net after 3 years | -$1,182 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X4-QScore: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Jasminer X16-P or Jasminer X4-Q more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-Q is more profitable at $-0.89/day compared to $-4.56/day for the Jasminer X16-P. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Jasminer X16-P or the Jasminer X4-Q better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
For mining at home, should I pick the Jasminer X16-P or the Jasminer X4-Q?
The Jasminer X4-Q scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Jasminer X16-P). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Jasminer X16-P and Jasminer X4-Q on J/TH?
The Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-Q runs at 355,769.2 J/TH — a difference of 28,183.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 8% better efficacité (327,586 vs 355,769 J/TH).