Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Jasminer X4

Jasminer X4

Taux de hachage 2.5 GH/s Puissance 1,200 W Efficiency 480,000.0 J/TH
VS
Jasminer X4-C 1U

Jasminer X4-C 1U

Taux de hachage 450.0 MH/s Puissance 240 W Efficiency 533,333.3 J/TH

Jasminer X4 vs Jasminer X4-C 1U

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Jasminer X4 Specification Jasminer X4-C 1U
2.5 GH/s Taux de hachage 450.0 MH/s
1,200 W Consommation électrique 240 W
480,000.0 J/TH Efficiency 533,333.3 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
Weight
4,094 BTU/hr BTU Output 819 BTU/hr
31/100 Home Mining Score 31/100
Release Year
Etchash Algorithme Etchash
Jasminer Manufacturer Jasminer

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Jasminer X4

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$2.88
Daily Profit -$2.88
Monthly -$86.40
Yearly -$1,051.17

Jasminer X4-C 1U

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$0.58
Daily Profit -$0.58
Monthly -$17.28
Yearly -$210.23

Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X4 comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 456% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Jasminer X4's favour. That said, the Jasminer X4-C 1U isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.

Winner: Jasminer X4 — l'emporte sur 3 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Jasminer X4 and Jasminer X4-C 1U sit on each measurable spec:

  • Jasminer X4 456% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Jasminer X4-C 1U 80% better power draw (1,200 vs 240 W)
  • Jasminer X4 10% better efficacité (480,000 vs 533,333 J/TH)
  • Jasminer X4 400% more heat output (4,094 vs 819 BTU/hr)

Cost & ROI Over Time

Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.

Jasminer X4 Metric Jasminer X4-C 1U
$999 Upfront cost (MSRP) $658
-$2.88 Daily net profit -$0.58
-$2,050 Net after 1 year -$868
-$3,101 Net after 2 years -$1,078
-$4,153 Net after 3 years -$1,289
Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) Payback period Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit)

Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Tie

Both miners are equally suitable for home use.

Best for Efficiency

Jasminer X4

480,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Jasminer X4 or the Jasminer X4-C 1U?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X4-C 1U is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Jasminer X4. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Which is quieter, the Jasminer X4 or Jasminer X4-C 1U?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Jasminer X4 vs Jasminer X4-C 1U: which fits a residential setup better?

Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.

What is the efficiency difference between Jasminer X4 and Jasminer X4-C 1U?

The Jasminer X4 runs at 480,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X4-C 1U runs at 533,333.3 J/TH — a difference of 53,333.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 10% better efficacité (480,000 vs 533,333 J/TH).