Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Taux de hachage 32.5 GH/s Puissance 750 W Efficiency 23,076.9 J/TH
VS
iBeLink DM22G

iBeLink DM22G

Taux de hachage 22.0 GH/s Puissance 810 W Efficiency 36,818.2 J/TH

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs iBeLink DM22G

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster Specification iBeLink DM22G
32.5 GH/s Taux de hachage 22.0 GH/s
750 W Consommation électrique 810 W
23,076.9 J/TH Efficiency 36,818.2 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
3,100.0 kg Weight 19,000.0 kg
2,559 BTU/hr BTU Output 2,764 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 28/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Innosilicon Manufacturer iBeLink

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$53.96
Yearly -$656.57

iBeLink DM22G

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.94
Daily Profit -$1.94
Monthly -$58.30
Yearly -$709.27

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Run the numbers across every spec and the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster edges it: 4 of 4 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 37% better efficacité (23,077 vs 36,818 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Innosilicon A5 DashMaster — l'emporte sur 4 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and iBeLink DM22G actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 48% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 7% better power draw (750 vs 810 W)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 37% better efficacité (23,077 vs 36,818 J/TH)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 84% better weight (3,100 vs 19,000 kg)
  • iBeLink DM22G 8% more heat output (2,559 vs 2,764 BTU/hr)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 7% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 28.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Score: 30/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

23,076.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which makes more money, the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster or the iBeLink DM22G?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster is more profitable at $-1.80/day compared to $-1.94/day for the iBeLink DM22G. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Is the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster or the iBeLink DM22G better for noise-sensitive spaces?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs iBeLink DM22G: which fits a residential setup better?

The Innosilicon A5 DashMaster scores 30/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the iBeLink DM22G). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and iBeLink DM22G?

The Innosilicon A5 DashMaster runs at 23,076.9 J/TH while the iBeLink DM22G runs at 36,818.2 J/TH — a difference of 13,741.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 37% better efficacité (23,077 vs 36,818 J/TH).