Passer au contenu

Nous améliorons nos opérations pour mieux vous servir. Les commandes sont expédiées normalement depuis Laval, QC. Questions? Contactez-nous

Bitcoin accepté au paiement  |  Expédié depuis Laval, QC, Canada  |  Soutien expert depuis 2016

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Taux de hachage 32.5 GH/s Puissance 750 W Efficiency 23,076.9 J/TH
VS
Baikal Giant+ A2000

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s Puissance 450 W Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Baikal Giant+ A2000

Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.

Specifications Comparison

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster Specification Baikal Giant+ A2000
32.5 GH/s Taux de hachage 2.0 GH/s
750 W Consommation électrique 450 W
23,076.9 J/TH Efficiency 225,000.0 J/TH
Niveau de bruit
3,100.0 kg Weight 2,980.0 kg
2,559 BTU/hr BTU Output 1,535 BTU/hr
30/100 Home Mining Score 34/100
Release Year
X11 Algorithme X11
Innosilicon Manufacturer Baikal

Profitability Comparison

$/kWh

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

Daily Revenue 0.00000001 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.80
Daily Profit -$1.80
Monthly -$53.96
Yearly -$656.57

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Daily Revenue 0.00000000 BTC $0.00
Daily Electricity -$1.08
Daily Profit -$1.08
Monthly -$32.40
Yearly -$394.17

Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.

Verdict

Our scoring model gives the nod to the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster, which leads on 2 of 4 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). Where it pulls away hardest is 1525% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Giant+ A2000 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.

Winner: Innosilicon A5 DashMaster — l'emporte sur 2 des 4 facteurs

Spec Deltas

Here is every spec where the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and Baikal Giant+ A2000 actually differ, with the gap quantified:

  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 1525% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 40% better power draw (750 vs 450 W)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 90% better efficacité (23,077 vs 225,000 J/TH)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 4% better weight (3,100 vs 2,980 kg)
  • Innosilicon A5 DashMaster 67% more heat output (2,559 vs 1,535 BTU/hr)
  • Baikal Giant+ A2000 13% more score de minage domestique (30.0 vs 34.0)

Best For...

Best for Profitability

Tie

Both miners produce similar daily profit.

Best for Home Mining

Baikal Giant+ A2000

Score: 34/100. 0 dB noise level.

Best for Efficiency

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster

23,076.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.

Frequently Asked Questions

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: which one earns more per day?

At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant+ A2000 is more profitable at $-1.08/day compared to $-1.80/day for the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: which runs at a lower noise level?

Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.

Innosilicon A5 DashMaster vs Baikal Giant+ A2000: which fits a residential setup better?

The Baikal Giant+ A2000 scores 34/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Innosilicon A5 DashMaster). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.

What is the efficiency difference between Innosilicon A5 DashMaster and Baikal Giant+ A2000?

The Innosilicon A5 DashMaster runs at 23,076.9 J/TH while the Baikal Giant+ A2000 runs at 225,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 201,923.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 90% better efficacité (23,077 vs 225,000 J/TH).