Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 2.0 GH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 3,580 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,790,000.0 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 15.0 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,215 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | IceRiver |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)
Based on BTC price of $75,294 and current network difficulty as of Mar 17, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE-BOX II et le Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)1,790,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-8.59/day for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 30/100 for the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE-BOX II and Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s)?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Iceriver ALEO AE3 (2Gh/s) runs at 1,790,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 8,024,814.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs.