Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-KA1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.5 TH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell E-KA1M
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell E-KA1M l'emporte sur 3 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 10185085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s). The Goldshell AE-BOX II holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell E-KA1M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-KA1M 10185085% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 71% better power draw (530 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 327 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 30% better noise (35.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 240% more heat output (1,808 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 16% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $910 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.12 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,415 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$3,919 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$5,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell E-KA1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.12/day for the Goldshell E-KA1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell E-KA1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-KA1M at 50 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-KA1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-KA1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 9,814,487.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 327 J/TH).