Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-KA1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.5 TH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell E-KA1M
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-KA1M edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 327 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell E-KA1M sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell E-KA1M 1527678% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 45% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 327 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 9% better noise (55.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max 83% more heat output (11,260 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 12% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $910 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.12 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,415 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$3,919 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-KA1MScore: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-KA1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-KA1M is more profitable at $-4.12/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell E-KA1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell E-KA1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell E-KA1M on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 9,166,339.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 327 J/TH).