Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-KA1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.5 TH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,800 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 327.3 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 50 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,142 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | KHeavyHash |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell E-KA1M
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-KA1M edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 327 J/TH). The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-KA1M diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell E-KA1M 1018419% more hashrate (0.0 vs 5.5 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 44% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,800 W)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 327 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 41% better noise (85.0 vs 50.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max II 78% more heat output (10,918 vs 6,142 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-KA1M 93% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell E-KA1M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $910 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.12 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,415 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$3,919 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$5,424 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-KA1MScore: 56/100. 50 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-KA1M327.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell E-KA1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-KA1M is more profitable at $-4.12/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell E-KA1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-KA1M is quieter at 50 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell E-KA1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-KA1M?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell E-KA1M runs at 327.3 J/TH — a difference of 5,925,598.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 100% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 327 J/TH).