Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-AE1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Card | Specification | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| 5.5 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 230.0 MH/s |
| 65 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 11,818,181.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 8,695,652.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 0.3 kg | Weight | 15.2 kg |
| 222 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 71/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Card
Goldshell E-AE1M
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE Card et le Goldshell E-AE1M sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell E-AE1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-AE1M 4082% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE Card 97% better power draw (65.0 vs 2,000.0 W)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 26% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 8,695,652 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Card 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Card 98% better weight (0.3 vs 15.2 kg)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 2977% more heat output (222 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Card 27% more score de minage domestique (71.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Card | Metric | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| $99 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$0.16 | Daily net profit | -$4.80 |
| -$156 | Net after 1 year | -$2,382 |
| -$213 | Net after 2 years | -$4,134 |
| -$270 | Net after 3 years | -$5,886 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE CardScore: 71/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AE1M8,695,652.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-AE1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE Card is more profitable at $-0.16/day compared to $-4.80/day for the Goldshell E-AE1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE Card vs Goldshell E-AE1M: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE Card is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AE1M at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Card or Goldshell E-AE1M?
The Goldshell AE Card scores 71/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-AE1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Card and Goldshell E-AE1M?
The Goldshell AE Card runs at 11,818,181.8 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AE1M runs at 8,695,652.2 J/TH — a difference of 3,122,529.7 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 26% better efficacité (11,818,182 vs 8,695,652 J/TH).