Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-AE1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Specification | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| 54.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 230.0 MH/s |
| 530 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 9,814,814.8 J/TH | Efficiency | 8,695,652.2 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 3.0 kg | Weight | 15.2 kg |
| 1,808 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 65/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX II
Goldshell E-AE1M
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell AE-BOX II l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 74% better power draw (530 vs 2,000 W) in the Goldshell AE-BOX II's favour. The Goldshell E-AE1M claws back ground on efficacité. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE-BOX II and Goldshell E-AE1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell E-AE1M 326% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 74% better power draw (530 vs 2,000 W)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 11% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 8,695,652 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 22% better noise (35.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 81% better weight (3.0 vs 15.2 kg)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 277% more heat output (1,808 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX II 16% more score de minage domestique (65.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX II | Metric | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$1.27 | Daily net profit | -$4.80 |
| -$584 | Net after 1 year | -$2,382 |
| -$1,049 | Net after 2 years | -$4,134 |
| -$1,513 | Net after 3 years | -$5,886 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX IIScore: 65/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AE1M8,695,652.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or Goldshell E-AE1M more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX II is more profitable at $-1.27/day compared to $-4.80/day for the Goldshell E-AE1M. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE-BOX II or the Goldshell E-AE1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell E-AE1M at 45 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-AE1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II scores 65/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 56/100 for the Goldshell E-AE1M). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Goldshell AE-BOX II vs Goldshell E-AE1M: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AE-BOX II runs at 9,814,814.8 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AE1M runs at 8,695,652.2 J/TH — a difference of 1,119,162.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 11% better efficacité (9,814,815 vs 8,695,652 J/TH).