Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell E-AE1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 230.0 MH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 8,695,652.2 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 15.2 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell E-AE1M
Based on BTC price of $78,235 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell E-AE1M edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 39% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,000 W). That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell E-AE1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AE Max 57% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 39% better power draw (3,300 vs 2,000 W)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 5% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 8,695,652 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 18% better noise (55.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max 11% better weight (13.5 vs 15.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 65% more heat output (11,260 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 12% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$4.80 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,382 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$4,134 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,886 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-AE1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell E-AE1M8,695,652.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell E-AE1M?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-AE1M is more profitable at $-4.80/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell E-AE1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-AE1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max at 55 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell E-AE1M?
The Goldshell E-AE1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 50/100 for the Goldshell AE Max). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell E-AE1M?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AE1M runs at 8,695,652.2 J/TH — a difference of 471,014.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 5% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 8,695,652 J/TH).