Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-AE1M
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 230.0 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 2,000 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 8,695,652.2 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | 45 dB |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 15.2 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,824 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 56/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Zksnark |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell E-AE1M
Based on BTC price of $78,252 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Scored side by side, the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-AE1M trade blows evenly. Neither pulls ahead decisively, so the deciding factor is which spec matters most to your setup — the panels above lay that out.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-AE1M actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell AE Max II 135% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 38% better power draw (3,200 vs 2,000 W)
- Goldshell AE Max II 32% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 8,695,652 J/TH)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 47% better noise (85.0 vs 45.0 dB)
- Goldshell AE Max II 18% better weight (12.5 vs 15.2 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 60% more heat output (10,918 vs 6,824 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell E-AE1M 93% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 56.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell E-AE1M |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $630 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$4.80 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,382 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$4,134 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$5,886 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell E-AE1MScore: 56/100. 45 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell AE Max II5,925,925.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-AE1M: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell E-AE1M is more profitable at $-4.80/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell E-AE1M better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Goldshell E-AE1M is quieter at 45 dB compared to the Goldshell AE Max II at 85 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell E-AE1M: which fits a residential setup better?
The Goldshell E-AE1M scores 56/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell E-AE1M on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell E-AE1M runs at 8,695,652.2 J/TH — a difference of 2,769,726.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 8,695,652 J/TH).