Goldshell AE Max vs Goldshell X5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max | Specification | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 850.0 MH/s |
| 3,300 W | Consommation électrique | 1,450 W |
| 9,166,666.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,705,882.4 J/TH |
| 55 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 13.5 kg | Weight | 4,600.0 kg |
| 11,260 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 50/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max
Goldshell X5
Based on BTC price of $78,233 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell X5 edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, consommation électrique, rapport qualité-prix). The standout gap is 81% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,705,882 J/TH) in the Goldshell X5's favour. That said, the Goldshell AE Max isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell X5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell X5 136% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell X5 56% better power draw (3,300 vs 1,450 W)
- Goldshell X5 81% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,705,882 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max 100% better weight (13.5 vs 4,600.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max 128% more heat output (11,260 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE Max 61% more score de minage domestique (50.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max | Metric | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| $870 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$7.92 | Daily net profit | -$3.48 |
| -$3,761 | Net after 1 year | -$2,470 |
| -$6,652 | Net after 2 years | -$3,740 |
| -$9,542 | Net after 3 years | -$5,011 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE MaxScore: 50/100. 55 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X51,705,882.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell X5?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell X5 is more profitable at $-3.48/day compared to $-7.92/day for the Goldshell AE Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max or Goldshell X5?
The Goldshell AE Max is quieter at 55 dB compared to the Goldshell X5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max or the Goldshell X5?
The Goldshell AE Max scores 50/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell X5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AE Max and Goldshell X5?
The Goldshell AE Max runs at 9,166,666.7 J/TH while the Goldshell X5 runs at 1,705,882.4 J/TH — a difference of 7,460,784.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 81% better efficacité (9,166,667 vs 1,705,882 J/TH).