Goldshell AE Max II vs Goldshell X5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE Max II | Specification | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| 540.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 850.0 MH/s |
| 3,200 W | Consommation électrique | 1,450 W |
| 5,925,925.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,705,882.4 J/TH |
| 85 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 12.5 kg | Weight | 4,600.0 kg |
| 10,918 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 29/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE Max II
Goldshell X5
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell X5 l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 71% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,705,882 J/TH). That said, the Goldshell AE Max II isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins niveau sonore. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell X5 sit on each measurable spec:
- Goldshell X5 57% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell X5 55% better power draw (3,200 vs 1,450 W)
- Goldshell X5 71% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,705,882 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE Max II 100% better weight (12.5 vs 4,600.0 kg)
- Goldshell AE Max II 121% more heat output (10,918 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell X5 7% more score de minage domestique (29.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE Max II | Metric | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,050 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$7.68 | Daily net profit | -$3.48 |
| -$3,853 | Net after 1 year | -$2,470 |
| -$6,656 | Net after 2 years | -$3,740 |
| -$9,460 | Net after 3 years | -$5,011 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell X5Score: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X51,705,882.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell X5 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell X5 is more profitable at $-3.48/day compared to $-7.68/day for the Goldshell AE Max II. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Goldshell AE Max II or Goldshell X5?
The Goldshell AE Max II is quieter at 85 dB compared to the Goldshell X5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE Max II or the Goldshell X5?
The Goldshell X5 scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 29/100 for the Goldshell AE Max II). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE Max II and Goldshell X5 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE Max II runs at 5,925,925.9 J/TH while the Goldshell X5 runs at 1,705,882.4 J/TH — a difference of 4,220,043.6 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 71% better efficacité (5,925,926 vs 1,705,882 J/TH).