Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell X5
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Specification | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| 44.0 MH/s | Taux de hachage | 850.0 MH/s |
| 460 W | Consommation électrique | 1,450 W |
| 10,454,545.5 J/TH | Efficiency | 1,705,882.4 J/TH |
| 35 dB | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 2.6 kg | Weight | 4,600.0 kg |
| 1,570 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,947 BTU/hr |
| 69/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Zksnark | Algorithme | Scrypt |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh
Goldshell X5
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Le Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh et le Goldshell X5 sont très proches sur l'ensemble de nos facteurs de notation, sans avantage décisif pour l'un ou l'autre. Votre choix devrait dépendre de vos priorités spécifiques — consultez les spécifications et l'analyse de rentabilité ci-dessus.
Spec Deltas
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell X5 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Goldshell X5 1832% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 68% better power draw (460 vs 1,450 W)
- Goldshell X5 84% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 1,705,882 J/TH)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 100% better weight (2.6 vs 4,600.0 kg)
- Goldshell X5 215% more heat output (1,570 vs 4,947 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh 123% more score de minage domestique (69.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh | Metric | Goldshell X5 |
|---|---|---|
| $120 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,200 |
| -$1.10 | Daily net profit | -$3.48 |
| -$523 | Net after 1 year | -$2,470 |
| -$926 | Net after 2 years | -$3,740 |
| -$1,329 | Net after 3 years | -$5,011 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44MhScore: 69/100. 35 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell X51,705,882.4 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell X5: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is more profitable at $-1.10/day compared to $-3.48/day for the Goldshell X5. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh vs Goldshell X5: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh is quieter at 35 dB compared to the Goldshell X5 at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh or the Goldshell X5?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh scores 69/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 31/100 for the Goldshell X5). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh and Goldshell X5 on J/TH?
The Goldshell AE-BOX Pro 44Mh runs at 10,454,545.5 J/TH while the Goldshell X5 runs at 1,705,882.4 J/TH — a difference of 8,748,663.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 84% better efficacité (10,454,545 vs 1,705,882 J/TH).