Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Dragonball Miner A40
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Specification | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| 360.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.3 TH/s |
| 180 W | Consommation électrique | 1,600 W |
| 500.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 484.9 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 14.5 kg |
| 614 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 5,459 BTU/hr |
| 33/100 | Home Mining Score | 42/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Dragonball |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)
Dragonball Miner A40
Based on BTC price of $78,244 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Dragonball Miner A40, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 817% more hashrate (0.4 vs 3.3 TH/s). That said, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Stripped to the numbers, this is how far apart the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Dragonball Miner A40 sit on each measurable spec:
- Dragonball Miner A40 817% more hashrate (0.4 vs 3.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 89% better power draw (180 vs 1,600 W)
- Dragonball Miner A40 3% better efficacité (500 vs 485 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) 85% better weight (2.2 vs 14.5 kg)
- Dragonball Miner A40 789% more heat output (614 vs 5,459 BTU/hr)
- Dragonball Miner A40 27% more score de minage domestique (33.0 vs 42.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) | Metric | Dragonball Miner A40 |
|---|---|---|
| $340 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,400 |
| -$0.42 | Daily net profit | -$3.72 |
| -$493 | Net after 1 year | -$4,758 |
| -$646 | Net after 2 years | -$6,116 |
| -$799 | Net after 3 years | -$7,475 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Dragonball Miner A40Score: 42/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Dragonball Miner A40484.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) or Dragonball Miner A40 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) is more profitable at $-0.42/day compared to $-3.72/day for the Dragonball Miner A40. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Dragonball Miner A40: which runs at a lower noise level?
The Dragonball Miner A40 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) vs Dragonball Miner A40: which fits a residential setup better?
The Dragonball Miner A40 scores 42/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 33/100 for the Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) and Dragonball Miner A40?
The Goldshell AL BOX (360Gh) runs at 500.0 J/TH while the Dragonball Miner A40 runs at 484.9 J/TH — a difference of 15.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 3% better efficacité (500 vs 485 J/TH).