Goldshell AL BOX III vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Specification | Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 16.6 TH/s |
| 600 W | Consommation électrique | 3,730 W |
| 480.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 224.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 2.2 kg | Weight | 13.6 kg |
| 2,047 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 12,727 BTU/hr |
| 30/100 | Home Mining Score | 30/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| Goldshell | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Goldshell AL BOX III
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,158 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro l'emporte sur 3 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 1228% more hashrate (1.3 vs 16.6 TH/s). The Goldshell AL BOX III claws back ground on consommation électrique and rapport qualité-prix. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Goldshell AL BOX III and Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 1228% more hashrate (1.3 vs 16.6 TH/s)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 84% better power draw (600 vs 3,730 W)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 53% better efficacité (480 vs 225 J/TH)
- Goldshell AL BOX III 84% better weight (2.2 vs 13.6 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro 522% more heat output (2,047 vs 12,727 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Goldshell AL BOX III | Metric | Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| $139 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $9,100 |
| -$1.40 | Daily net profit | -$8.35 |
| -$648 | Net after 1 year | -$12,150 |
| -$1,157 | Net after 2 years | -$15,199 |
| -$1,667 | Net after 3 years | -$18,249 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro224.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Goldshell AL BOX III or the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell AL BOX III is more profitable at $-1.40/day compared to $-8.35/day for the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Goldshell AL BOX III or the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro better for noise-sensitive spaces?
The Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Goldshell AL BOX III at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Goldshell AL BOX III or the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
Goldshell AL BOX III vs Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Goldshell AL BOX III runs at 480.0 J/TH while the Bitmain Antminer AL1 Pro runs at 224.7 J/TH — a difference of 255.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 53% better efficacité (480 vs 225 J/TH).