Iceriver AL3 vs colengine P2
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Iceriver AL3 | Specification | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 38.0 GH/s |
| 3,500 W | Consommation électrique | 1,458 W |
| 233.3 J/TH | Efficiency | 38,368.4 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 80 dB |
| 16.0 kg | Weight | 14.8 kg |
| 11,942 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,975 BTU/hr |
| 36/100 | Home Mining Score | 38/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Blake3 | Algorithme | Blake3 |
| IceRiver | Manufacturer | colengine |
Profitability Comparison
Iceriver AL3
colengine P2
Based on BTC price of $78,218 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Iceriver AL3, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Where it pulls away hardest is 39374% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.0 TH/s). The colengine P2 holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Iceriver AL3 and colengine P2 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Iceriver AL3 39374% more hashrate (15.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- colengine P2 58% better power draw (3,500 vs 1,458 W)
- Iceriver AL3 99% better efficacité (233 vs 38,368 J/TH)
- Iceriver AL3 6% better noise (75.0 vs 80.0 dB)
- colengine P2 8% better weight (16.0 vs 14.8 kg)
- Iceriver AL3 140% more heat output (11,942 vs 4,975 BTU/hr)
- colengine P2 6% more score de minage domestique (36.0 vs 38.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Hardware cost is only half the story — here is how each miner's upfront price plays out against cumulative profit at a $0.10/kWh rate.
| Iceriver AL3 | Metric | colengine P2 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,550 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,290 |
| -$7.86 | Daily net profit | -$3.50 |
| -$4,419 | Net after 1 year | -$2,567 |
| -$7,288 | Net after 2 years | -$3,843 |
| -$10,157 | Net after 3 years | -$5,120 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
colengine P2Score: 38/100. 80 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Iceriver AL3233.3 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Iceriver AL3 or the colengine P2?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the colengine P2 is more profitable at $-3.50/day compared to $-7.86/day for the Iceriver AL3. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Iceriver AL3 or colengine P2?
The Iceriver AL3 is quieter at 75 dB compared to the colengine P2 at 80 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Iceriver AL3 or the colengine P2?
The colengine P2 scores 38/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 36/100 for the Iceriver AL3). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Iceriver AL3 vs colengine P2: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Iceriver AL3 runs at 233.3 J/TH while the colengine P2 runs at 38,368.4 J/TH — a difference of 38,135.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (233 vs 38,368 J/TH).