Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) vs Baikal Giant A900
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) | Specification | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| 15.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 900.0 MH/s |
| 1,200 W | Consommation électrique | 270 W |
| 80,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 5,500.0 kg | Weight | 2,550.0 kg |
| 4,094 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 921 BTU/hr |
| 31/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh)
Baikal Giant A900
Based on BTC price of $78,217 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh), which leads on 2 of 3 weighted factors (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 1567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh)'s favour. The Baikal Giant A900 holds the edge in consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) and Baikal Giant A900 diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) 1567% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Giant A900 78% better power draw (1,200 vs 270 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) 73% better efficacité (80,000 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Baikal Giant A900 54% better weight (5,500 vs 2,550 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) 344% more heat output (4,094 vs 921 BTU/hr)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) | Metric | Baikal Giant A900 |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,499 |
| -$2.88 | Daily net profit | -$0.65 |
| -$1,051 | Net after 1 year | -$2,735 |
| -$2,102 | Net after 2 years | -$2,972 |
| -$3,153 | Net after 3 years | -$3,209 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
TieBoth miners are equally suitable for home use.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh)80,000.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) or Baikal Giant A900 more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Giant A900 is more profitable at $-0.65/day compared to $-2.88/day for the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) or the Baikal Giant A900 better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) vs Baikal Giant A900: which fits a residential setup better?
Both miners score similarly on our Home Mining Score. Consider your specific constraints (noise tolerance, available power, heat needs) to decide.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) and Baikal Giant A900 on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer D3 (15Gh) runs at 80,000.0 J/TH while the Baikal Giant A900 runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 220,000.0 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 73% better efficacité (80,000 vs 300,000 J/TH).