Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 119.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 1,566 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 13,159.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 7,500.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 5,343 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $78,241 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 2 of 4 (efficacité, hashrate). The standout gap is 39567% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.0 TH/s) in the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)'s favour. That said, the Baikal Miner Cube isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) and Baikal Miner Cube diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 39567% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 94% better power draw (1,566.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 96% better efficacité (13,160 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 1640% more heat output (5,343 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Miner Cube 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$1,370 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$2,741 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$4,111 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Miner CubeScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)13,159.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or Baikal Miner Cube more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-3.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Is the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or the Baikal Miner Cube better for noise-sensitive spaces?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) and Baikal Miner Cube?
The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) runs at 13,159.7 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 286,840.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 96% better efficacité (13,160 vs 300,000 J/TH).