Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) vs Antminer E9 Pro
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Specification | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| 119.0 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 3,680.0 MH/s |
| 1,566 W | Consommation électrique | 2,200 W |
| 13,159.7 J/TH | Efficiency | 597,826.1 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 7,500.0 kg | Weight | 14.2 kg |
| 5,343 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 7,506 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 40/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Bitmain |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)
Antminer E9 Pro
Based on BTC price of $78,230 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) comes out ahead — it takes 3 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique). The standout gap is 98% better efficacité (13,160 vs 597,826 J/TH) in the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)'s favour. That said, the Antminer E9 Pro isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins score de minage domestique and niveau sonore. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) and Antminer E9 Pro diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 3134% more hashrate (0.1 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 29% better power draw (1,566 vs 2,200 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) 98% better efficacité (13,160 vs 597,826 J/TH)
- Antminer E9 Pro 100% better weight (7,500.0 vs 14.2 kg)
- Antminer E9 Pro 40% more heat output (5,343 vs 7,506 BTU/hr)
- Antminer E9 Pro 43% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 40.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) | Metric | Antminer E9 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| — | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $3,000 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$5.28 |
| -$1,370 | Net after 1 year | -$4,927 |
| -$2,741 | Net after 2 years | -$6,854 |
| -$4,111 | Net after 3 years | -$8,781 |
| — | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Antminer E9 ProScore: 40/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)13,159.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or the Antminer E9 Pro?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) is more profitable at $-3.75/day compared to $-5.28/day for the Antminer E9 Pro. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or Antminer E9 Pro?
The Antminer E9 Pro is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) or the Antminer E9 Pro?
The Antminer E9 Pro scores 40/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) and Antminer E9 Pro on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer D5 (119Gh) runs at 13,159.7 J/TH while the Antminer E9 Pro runs at 597,826.1 J/TH — a difference of 584,666.4 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 98% better efficacité (13,160 vs 597,826 J/TH).