Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) vs Baikal Miner Cube
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) | Specification | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| 1.3 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 300.0 MH/s |
| 3,148 W | Consommation électrique | 90 W |
| 2,447.9 J/TH | Efficiency | 300,000.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | — |
| 10,741 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 307 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| X11 | Algorithme | X11 |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Baikal |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh)
Baikal Miner Cube
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) edges it: 3 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 428567% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s). The Baikal Miner Cube holds the edge in consommation électrique and score de minage domestique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) and Baikal Miner Cube diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) 428567% more hashrate (1.3 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Baikal Miner Cube 97% better power draw (3,148.0 vs 90.0 W)
- Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) 99% better efficacité (2,448 vs 300,000 J/TH)
- Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) 3398% more heat output (10,741 vs 307 BTU/hr)
- Baikal Miner Cube 64% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) | Metric | Baikal Miner Cube |
|---|---|---|
| $2,595 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,000 |
| -$7.51 | Daily net profit | -$0.22 |
| -$5,336 | Net after 1 year | -$1,079 |
| -$8,077 | Net after 2 years | -$1,158 |
| -$10,817 | Net after 3 years | -$1,236 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Baikal Miner CubeScore: 36/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh)2,447.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) or Baikal Miner Cube more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Baikal Miner Cube is more profitable at $-0.22/day compared to $-7.51/day for the Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) or Baikal Miner Cube?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) or Baikal Miner Cube?
The Baikal Miner Cube scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) and Baikal Miner Cube on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer D7 (1286Gh) runs at 2,447.9 J/TH while the Baikal Miner Cube runs at 300,000.0 J/TH — a difference of 297,552.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 99% better efficacité (2,448 vs 300,000 J/TH).