Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V2H
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) | Specification | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| 9.5 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 3.4 GH/s |
| 2,470 W | Consommation électrique | 475 W |
| 260,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 139,705.9 J/TH |
| 75 dB | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 14.2 kg | Weight | 7.9 kg |
| 8,428 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 1,621 BTU/hr |
| 40/100 | Home Mining Score | 55/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)
iPollo V2H
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Our scoring model gives the nod to the iPollo V2H, which leads on 4 of 6 weighted factors (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Its biggest concrete edge: 81% better power draw (2,470 vs 475 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) and iPollo V2H diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 179% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V2H 81% better power draw (2,470 vs 475 W)
- iPollo V2H 46% better efficacité (260,000 vs 139,706 J/TH)
- iPollo V2H 13% better noise (75.0 vs 65.0 dB)
- iPollo V2H 44% better weight (14.2 vs 7.9 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) 420% more heat output (8,428 vs 1,621 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V2H 38% more score de minage domestique (40.0 vs 55.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) | Metric | iPollo V2H |
|---|---|---|
| $1,902 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $1,850 |
| -$5.93 | Daily net profit | -$1.14 |
| -$4,066 | Net after 1 year | -$2,266 |
| -$6,229 | Net after 2 years | -$2,682 |
| -$8,393 | Net after 3 years | -$3,098 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V2HScore: 55/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V2H139,705.9 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) or the iPollo V2H?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V2H is more profitable at $-1.14/day compared to $-5.93/day for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) vs iPollo V2H: which runs at a lower noise level?
The iPollo V2H is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) at 75 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
For mining at home, should I pick the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) or the iPollo V2H?
The iPollo V2H scores 55/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 40/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) and iPollo V2H on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer E11 (9.5Gh) runs at 260,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V2H runs at 139,705.9 J/TH — a difference of 120,294.1 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 46% better efficacité (260,000 vs 139,706 J/TH).