Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 330.0 MH/s |
| 2,556 W | Consommation électrique | 240 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 727,272.7 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 40 dB |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 2.4 kg |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 819 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 66/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iPollo |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330
Based on BTC price of $78,226 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 l'emporte sur 4 des 6 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). Where it pulls away hardest is 91% better power draw (2,556 vs 240 W). The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) holds the edge in hashrate and rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 627% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 91% better power draw (2,556 vs 240 W)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 32% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 727,273 J/TH)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 2.4 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 965% more heat output (8,721 vs 819 BTU/hr)
- iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 200% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 66.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $899 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$0.58 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$1,109 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$1,319 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$1,530 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330Score: 66/100. 40 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330727,272.7 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is more profitable at $-0.58/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 is quieter at 40 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: which fits a residential setup better?
The iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 scores 66/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the iPollo V1 Mini Wifi 330 runs at 727,272.7 J/TH — a difference of 337,727.3 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 32% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 727,273 J/TH).