Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs Jasminer X16-P
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Specification | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| 2.4 GH/s | Taux de hachage | 5.8 GH/s |
| 2,556 W | Consommation électrique | 1,900 W |
| 1,065,000.0 J/TH | Efficiency | 327,586.2 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 14,200.0 kg | Weight | 14.0 kg |
| 8,721 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 6,483 BTU/hr |
| 22/100 | Home Mining Score | 28/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| EtHash | Algorithme | EtHash |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Jasminer |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)
Jasminer X16-P
Based on BTC price of $78,195 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Weighing six performance factors, the Jasminer X16-P comes out ahead — it takes 4 of 5 (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique). Where it pulls away hardest is 69% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 327,586 J/TH). That said, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins rapport qualité-prix. Review the detailed specs and profitability calculations above to determine which miner best fits your specific setup.
Spec Deltas
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and Jasminer X16-P diverge on the metrics below — each gap expressed as a real percentage, not a vague "better":
- Jasminer X16-P 142% more hashrate (0.0 vs 0.0 TH/s)
- Jasminer X16-P 26% better power draw (2,556 vs 1,900 W)
- Jasminer X16-P 69% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 327,586 J/TH)
- Jasminer X16-P 100% better weight (14,200.0 vs 14.0 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) 35% more heat output (8,721 vs 6,483 BTU/hr)
- Jasminer X16-P 27% more score de minage domestique (22.0 vs 28.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) | Metric | Jasminer X16-P |
|---|---|---|
| $1,000 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $2,550 |
| -$6.13 | Daily net profit | -$4.56 |
| -$3,239 | Net after 1 year | -$4,214 |
| -$5,478 | Net after 2 years | -$5,879 |
| -$7,717 | Net after 3 years | -$7,543 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Jasminer X16-PScore: 28/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Jasminer X16-P327,586.2 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) vs Jasminer X16-P: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Jasminer X16-P is more profitable at $-4.56/day compared to $-6.13/day for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or Jasminer X16-P?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) or Jasminer X16-P?
The Jasminer X16-P scores 28/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 22/100 for the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) and Jasminer X16-P on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer E9 (2.4Gh) runs at 1,065,000.0 J/TH while the Jasminer X16-P runs at 327,586.2 J/TH — a difference of 737,413.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 69% better efficacité (1,065,000 vs 327,586 J/TH).