Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs iBeLink BM-N3 Max
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Specification | iBeLink BM-N3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 30.0 TH/s |
| 1,580 W | Consommation électrique | 3,300 W |
| 1,398.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 110.0 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 75 dB |
| 6,100.0 kg | Weight | 6.6 kg |
| 5,391 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 11,260 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 36/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | iBeLink |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
iBeLink BM-N3 Max
Based on BTC price of $78,200 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the iBeLink BM-N3 Max edges it: 4 of 5 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore). The standout gap is 2555% more hashrate (1.1 vs 30.0 TH/s) in the iBeLink BM-N3 Max's favour. The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) claws back ground on consommation électrique. The right pick still depends on your power cost and noise tolerance — the breakdowns above make that call concrete.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and iBeLink BM-N3 Max actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 2555% more hashrate (1.1 vs 30.0 TH/s)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 52% better power draw (1,580 vs 3,300 W)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 92% better efficacité (1,398 vs 110 J/TH)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 100% better weight (6,100.0 vs 6.6 kg)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 109% more heat output (5,391 vs 11,260 BTU/hr)
- iBeLink BM-N3 Max 29% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 36.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Metric | iBeLink BM-N3 Max |
|---|---|---|
| $925 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | — |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$6.84 |
| -$2,294 | Net after 1 year | -$2,497 |
| -$3,663 | Net after 2 years | -$4,993 |
| -$5,033 | Net after 3 years | -$7,490 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | — |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
iBeLink BM-N3 MaxScore: 36/100. 75 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
iBeLink BM-N3 Max110.0 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or iBeLink BM-N3 Max more profitable?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) is more profitable at $-3.75/day compared to $-6.84/day for the iBeLink BM-N3 Max. Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or iBeLink BM-N3 Max?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max is quieter at 75 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or iBeLink BM-N3 Max?
The iBeLink BM-N3 Max scores 36/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
What is the efficiency difference between Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and iBeLink BM-N3 Max?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH while the iBeLink BM-N3 Max runs at 110.0 J/TH — a difference of 1,288.2 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 92% better efficacité (1,398 vs 110 J/TH).