Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK-BOX
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Specification | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 1.1 TH/s |
| 1,580 W | Consommation électrique | 215 W |
| 1,398.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 204.8 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | — |
| 6,100.0 kg | Weight | 2,000.0 kg |
| 5,391 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 734 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 31/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
Goldshell CK-BOX
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Selon notre analyse multifactorielle, le Goldshell CK-BOX l'emporte sur 4 des 5 facteurs (efficacité, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 86% better power draw (1,580 vs 215 W). That said, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) isn't beaten everywhere — it still wins hashrate. Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK-BOX actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 8% more hashrate (1.1 vs 1.1 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 86% better power draw (1,580 vs 215 W)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 85% better efficacité (1,398 vs 205 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 67% better weight (6,100 vs 2,000 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 635% more heat output (5,391 vs 734 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-BOX 11% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 31.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
A miner pays for itself in profit, not specs. These projections track upfront cost against one, two and three years of net earnings at $0.10/kWh.
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Metric | Goldshell CK-BOX |
|---|---|---|
| $925 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $190 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$0.48 |
| -$2,294 | Net after 1 year | -$365 |
| -$3,663 | Net after 2 years | -$539 |
| -$5,033 | Net after 3 years | -$714 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-BOXScore: 31/100. 0 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-BOX204.8 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Which makes more money, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or the Goldshell CK-BOX?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-BOX is more profitable at $-0.48/day compared to $-3.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK-BOX: which runs at a lower noise level?
Both miners have similar noise levels. Check the specs table above for exact decibel readings.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or Goldshell CK-BOX?
The Goldshell CK-BOX scores 31/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
How far apart are the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK-BOX on J/TH?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-BOX runs at 204.8 J/TH — a difference of 1,193.5 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 85% better efficacité (1,398 vs 205 J/TH).