Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK-LITE
Side-by-side specs, profitability, and home mining comparison.
Specifications Comparison
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Specification | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| 1.1 TH/s | Taux de hachage | 6.3 TH/s |
| 1,580 W | Consommation électrique | 1,200 W |
| 1,398.2 J/TH | Efficiency | 190.5 J/TH |
| — | Niveau de bruit | 65 dB |
| 6,100.0 kg | Weight | 7.5 kg |
| 5,391 BTU/hr | BTU Output | 4,094 BTU/hr |
| 28/100 | Home Mining Score | 52/100 |
| — | Release Year | — |
| Eaglesong | Algorithme | Eaglesong |
| Bitmain | Manufacturer | Goldshell |
Profitability Comparison
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)
Goldshell CK-LITE
Based on BTC price of $78,223 and current network difficulty as of May 16, 2026. Actual results vary.
Verdict
Run the numbers across every spec and the Goldshell CK-LITE edges it: 6 of 6 factors go its way (efficacité, hashrate, consommation électrique, score de minage domestique, niveau sonore, rapport qualité-prix). Its biggest concrete edge: 86% better efficacité (1,398 vs 190 J/TH). Cross-check the spec deltas and ROI table above against your own electricity rate before deciding.
Spec Deltas
Here is every spec where the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) and Goldshell CK-LITE actually differ, with the gap quantified:
- Goldshell CK-LITE 458% more hashrate (1.1 vs 6.3 TH/s)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 24% better power draw (1,580 vs 1,200 W)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 86% better efficacité (1,398 vs 190 J/TH)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 100% better weight (6,100.0 vs 7.5 kg)
- Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) 32% more heat output (5,391 vs 4,094 BTU/hr)
- Goldshell CK-LITE 86% more score de minage domestique (28.0 vs 52.0)
Cost & ROI Over Time
Sticker price versus what the miner actually earns back: the table below projects cumulative net profit at a $0.10/kWh electricity rate.
| Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) | Metric | Goldshell CK-LITE |
|---|---|---|
| $925 | Upfront cost (MSRP) | $599 |
| -$3.75 | Daily net profit | -$2.65 |
| -$2,294 | Net after 1 year | -$1,567 |
| -$3,663 | Net after 2 years | -$2,536 |
| -$5,033 | Net after 3 years | -$3,504 |
| Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) | Payback period | Does not pay back at current rates (negative daily profit) |
Projections assume continuous operation, a flat $0.10/kWh rate, and no hardware degradation, pool fees, or BTC price change. Real-world ROI varies.
Best For...
Best for Profitability
TieBoth miners produce similar daily profit.
Best for Home Mining
Goldshell CK-LITEScore: 52/100. 65 dB noise level.
Best for Efficiency
Goldshell CK-LITE190.5 J/TH — lower electricity cost per terahash.
Frequently Asked Questions
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK-LITE: which one earns more per day?
At the current BTC price and a $0.10/kWh electricity rate, the Goldshell CK-LITE is more profitable at $-2.65/day compared to $-3.75/day for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh). Profitability depends heavily on your electricity rate — use the selector above to calculate with your actual costs.
Which is quieter, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell CK-LITE is quieter at 65 dB compared to the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) at 0 dB. For home mining, lower noise levels make a significant difference in livability.
Which is better for home mining, the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) or Goldshell CK-LITE?
The Goldshell CK-LITE scores 52/100 on our Home Mining Score (vs 28/100 for the Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh)). This composite score factors in noise, power requirements, heat output, size, and setup ease — all critical for residential mining.
Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) vs Goldshell CK-LITE: how much does the efficiency gap matter?
The Bitmain Antminer K5 (1130Gh) runs at 1,398.2 J/TH while the Goldshell CK-LITE runs at 190.5 J/TH — a difference of 1,207.8 J/TH. Lower efficiency means less electricity per terahash of mining power, directly reducing operating costs. In relative terms that is 86% better efficacité (1,398 vs 190 J/TH).